↓ Skip to main content

Multi-site genetic analysis of diffusion images and voxelwise heritability analysis: A pilot project of the ENIGMA–DTI working group

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
350 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-site genetic analysis of diffusion images and voxelwise heritability analysis: A pilot project of the ENIGMA–DTI working group
Published in
NeuroImage, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neda Jahanshad, Peter V. Kochunov, Emma Sprooten, René C. Mandl, Thomas E. Nichols, Laura Almasy, John Blangero, Rachel M. Brouwer, Joanne E. Curran, Greig I. de Zubicaray, Ravi Duggirala, Peter T. Fox, L. Elliot Hong, Bennett A. Landman, Nicholas G. Martin, Katie L. McMahon, Sarah E. Medland, Braxton D. Mitchell, Rene L. Olvera, Charles P. Peterson, John M. Starr, Jessika E. Sussmann, Arthur W. Toga, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Margaret J. Wright, Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol, Mark E. Bastin, Andrew M. McIntosh, Ian J. Deary, Paul M. Thompson, David C. Glahn

Abstract

The ENIGMA (Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis) Consortium was set up to analyze brain measures and genotypes from multiple sites across the world to improve the power to detect genetic variants that influence the brain. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) yields quantitative measures sensitive to brain development and degeneration, and some common genetic variants may be associated with white matter integrity or connectivity. DTI measures, such as the fractional anisotropy (FA) of water diffusion, may be useful for identifying genetic variants that influence brain microstructure. However, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) require large populations to obtain sufficient power to detect and replicate significant effects, motivating a multi-site consortium effort. As part of an ENIGMA-DTI working group, we analyzed high-resolution FA images from multiple imaging sites across North America, Australia, and Europe, to address the challenge of harmonizing imaging data collected at multiple sites. Four hundred images of healthy adults aged 18-85 from four sites were used to create a template and corresponding skeletonized FA image as a common reference space. Using twin and pedigree samples of different ethnicities, we used our common template to evaluate the heritability of tract-derived FA measures. We show that our template is reliable for integrating multiple datasets by combining results through meta-analysis and unifying the data through exploratory mega-analyses. Our results may help prioritize regions of the FA map that are consistently influenced by additive genetic factors for future genetic discovery studies. Protocols and templates are publicly available at (http://enigma.loni.ucla.edu/ongoing/dti-working-group/).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 253 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 29%
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Student > Master 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 40 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 14%
Psychology 35 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Engineering 16 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 77 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#10,823
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,828
of 204,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#207
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.