↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the efficacy and neuroinflammatory potential of three anti-abeta antibodies

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Comparing the efficacy and neuroinflammatory potential of three anti-abeta antibodies
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00401-015-1484-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P. Fuller, Jeffrey B. Stavenhagen, Søren Christensen, Fredrik Kartberg, Martin J. Glennie, Jessica L. Teeling

Abstract

Immunotherapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Antibodies directed against Amyloid Beta (Aβ) are able to successfully clear plaques and reverse cognitive deficits in mouse models. Excitement towards this approach has been tempered by high profile failures in the clinic, one key issue has been the development of inflammatory side effects in the brain (ARIAs). New antibodies are entering the clinic for Alzheimer's disease; therefore, it is important to learn all we can from the current generation. In this study, we directly compared 3 clinical candidates in the same pre-clinical model, with the same effector function, for their ability to clear plaques and induce inflammation in the brain. We produced murine versions of the antibodies: Bapineuzumab (3D6), Crenezumab (mC2) and Gantenerumab (chGantenerumab) with an IgG2a constant region. 18-month transgenic APP mice (Tg2576) were injected bilaterally into the hippocampus with 2 µg of each antibody or control. After 7 days, the mice tissue was analysed for clearance of plaques and neuroinflammation by histology and biochemical analysis. 3D6 was the best binder to plaques and in vitro, whilst mC2 bound the least strongly. This translated into 3D6 effectively clearing plaques and reducing the levels of insoluble Aβ, whilst chGantenerumab and mC2 did not. 3D6 caused a significant increase in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα, and an associated increase in microglial expression of CD11B and CD68. chGantenerumab increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and microglial activation, but minimal changes in CD68, as an indicator of phagocytosis. Injection of mC2 did not cause any significant inflammatory changes. Our results demonstrate that the ability of an antibody to clear plaques and induce inflammation is dependent on the epitope and affinity of the antibody.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Neuroscience 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#708,188
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#97
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,174
of 291,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.