↓ Skip to main content

Streptococcal toxins: role in pathogenesis and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular Microbiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Streptococcal toxins: role in pathogenesis and disease
Published in
Cellular Microbiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/cmi.12531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy C Barnett, Jason N Cole, Tania Rivera-Hernandez, Anna Henningham, James C Paton, Victor Nizet, Mark J Walker

Abstract

Group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes; GAS), group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae; GBS) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) are host-adapted bacterial pathogens among the leading infectious causes of human morbidity and mortality. These microbes and related members of the genus Streptococcus produce an array of toxins that act against human cells or tissues, resulting in impaired immune responses and subversion of host physiological processes to benefit the invading microorganism. This toxin repertoire includes hemolysins, proteases, superantigens and other agents that ultimately enhance colonization and survival within the host and promote dissemination of the pathogen. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 253 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 20%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 85 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 87 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,312,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cellular Microbiology
#242
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,187
of 392,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular Microbiology
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.