↓ Skip to main content

A collaborative approach to improve the assessment of physical health in adult consumers with schizophrenia in Queensland mental health services

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Psychiatry, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A collaborative approach to improve the assessment of physical health in adult consumers with schizophrenia in Queensland mental health services
Published in
Australasian Psychiatry, October 2015
DOI 10.1177/1039856215608285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Plever, Irene McCarthy, Melissa Anzolin, Brett Emmerson, Mohsina Khatun

Abstract

The objective of this study was to apply a quality improvement collaborative to increase the number of physical health assessments conducted with consumers diagnosed with schizophrenia in adult community mental health services across Queensland. Sixteen adult mental health service organisations voluntarily took part in the statewide collaborative initiative to increase the number of physical health assessments completed on persons with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders managed through the community mental health service. Improvement in the physical health assessment clinical indicator was demonstrated across the state over a 3-year period with an increase in the number of physical health assessments recorded from 12% to 58%. Significant improvements were made over a 3-year period by all mental health services involved in the collaborative, supporting the application of a quality improvement methodology to drive change across mental health services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Psychiatry
#843
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,034
of 275,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Psychiatry
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.