↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Classroom Active Engagement in Elementary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Classroom Active Engagement in Elementary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2615-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Sparapani, Lindee Morgan, Vanessa P. Reinhardt, Christopher Schatschneider, Amy M. Wetherby

Abstract

This study evaluated the classroom measure of active engagement (CMAE), an observational tool designed to measure active engagement in students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Participants included 196 students with ASD and their educators (n = 126) who were video-recorded at the beginning of the school year. Findings documented limited active engagement overall, with students spending less than half of the observation well-regulated, productive, or independent and infrequently directing eye gaze and communicating. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the structure of the CMAE was represented by a 5-factor model. These findings underscore the need for improved active engagement in students with ASD and show promise for a tool to measure behaviors associated with positive educational outcomes in students with ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 208 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 26%
Social Sciences 35 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 65 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,148,945
of 23,931,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#962
of 5,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,577
of 279,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#25
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,931,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.