| Title |
Conventional Weaning Parameters do not Predict Extubation Failure in Neurocritical Care Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurocritical Care, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12028-008-9181-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Ko, Leah Ramos, Julio A. Chalela |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 28% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,425,896
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#608
of 1,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,252
of 171,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.