↓ Skip to main content

Variation in coordination of care reported by breast cancer patients according to health literacy

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Variation in coordination of care reported by breast cancer patients according to health literacy
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00520-018-4370-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria C. Mora-Pinzon, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles, Robert T. Greenlee, Laurel Hoeth, John M. Hampton, Maureen A. Smith, Bradley D. McDowell, Lee G. Wilke, Amy Trentham-Dietz

Abstract

Health literacy is the ability to perform basic reading and numerical tasks to function in the healthcare environment. The purpose of this study is to describe how health literacy is related to perceived coordination of care reported by breast cancer patients. Data were retrieved from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-sponsored "Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer" Study including demographic factors, perceived care coordination and responsiveness of care, and self-reported health literacy obtained from a mailed survey completed by 62% of eligible breast cancer survivors (N = 1221). Multivariable analysis of variance was used to characterize the association between presence of a single healthcare professional that coordinated care ("care coordinator") and perceived care coordination, stratified by health literacy level. Health literacy was classified as low in 24% of patients, medium in 34%, and high in 42%. Women with high health literacy scores were more likely to report non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity, private insurance, higher education and income, and fewer comorbidities (all p < 0.001). The presence of a care coordinator was associated with 17.1% higher perceived care coordination scores among women with low health literacy when compared to those without a care coordinator, whereas a coordinator modestly improved perceived care coordination among breast cancer survivors with medium (6.9%) and high (6.2%) health literacy. The use of a single designated care coordinator may have a strong influence on care coordination in patients with lower levels of health literacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Engineering 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,708,517
of 25,159,758 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#849
of 5,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,259
of 335,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#35
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,159,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.