| Title |
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydroelectric Dams: Reply tO Rosa Et al.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-005-9016-z |
| Authors |
Philip M. Fearnside |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 25% |
| Unknown | 7 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 54 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 34% |
| Engineering | 13 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,770,845
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,134
of 5,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,118
of 153,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.