↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of specific cost of obtainment of lead-208 isotope by gas centrifuges using various raw materials

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of specific cost of obtainment of lead-208 isotope by gas centrifuges using various raw materials
Published in
Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, August 2012
DOI 10.1134/s0040579512040161
Authors

A. Yu. Smirnov, V. D. Borisevich, A. Sulaberidze

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 33%
Unspecified 2 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,711,992
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering
#10
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,383
of 168,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them