↓ Skip to main content

Functional dizziness: diagnostic keys and differential diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Functional dizziness: diagnostic keys and differential diagnosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7826-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Brandt, Doreen Huppert, Michael Strupp, Marianne Dieterich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Other 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 44%
Neuroscience 8 20%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,640
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,860
of 262,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#43
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.