↓ Skip to main content

The antecedents, forms and consequences of patient involvement: A narrative review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nursing Studies, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The antecedents, forms and consequences of patient involvement: A narrative review of the literature
Published in
International Journal of Nursing Studies, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.09.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Snyder, Jon Engström

Abstract

Despite the centrality of patient involvement in the policy and rhetoric of health care, the theoretical and empirical basis for patient involvement is lacking at the micro-level of practice. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview and synthesize the current empirical research related to patient involvement at the micro-level of health care. Narrative review. A database search was conducted (in PubMed, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, EconLit and PsycINFO) for articles published between 1990 and April 2015 in the field of patient involvement in health care. Out of 4238 references, 214 articles were eligible for this review. We analyzed our sample using thematic analysis. The reviewed articles revealed nine themes for patient involvement, concerning enablers; empowerment, patient education, communication for involvement, staff training, service systems, types; decision making, delivery, development, and consequences of patient involvement. The themes were synthesized into a tentative model that described patient-involvement research. Our narrative review includes a wide variety of empirical studies on patient involvement in decision-making, delivery and development, and provides an integrative perspective suggesting that patient involvement should be viewed not only as isolated activities, but also as a result of educating and preparing patients, staff and systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 262 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 58 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Social Sciences 30 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 6%
Computer Science 13 5%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 74 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,405,155
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#828
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,434
of 286,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#15
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.