You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
微生物2次代謝産物生合成の機能的改変による有用物質の生産
|
---|---|
Published in |
KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU, January 1996
|
DOI | 10.1271/kagakutoseibutsu1962.34.761 |
Authors |
池田 治生, 大村 智 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 11 | 33% |
Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 94% |
Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,934,973
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU
#15
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,442
of 80,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.