↓ Skip to main content

Benzodiazepine-associated delirium in critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Benzodiazepine-associated delirium in critically ill adults
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4063-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene J. Zaal, John W. Devlin, Marijn Hazelbag, Peter M. C. Klein Klouwenberg, Arendina W. van der Kooi, David S. Y. Ong, Olaf L. Cremer, Rolf H. Groenwold, Arjen J. C. Slooter

Abstract

The association between benzodiazepine use and delirium risk in the ICU remains unclear. Prior investigations have failed to account for disease severity prior to delirium onset, competing events that may preclude delirium detection, other important delirium risk factors, and an adequate number of patients receiving continuous midazolam. The aim of this study was to address these limitations and evaluate the association between benzodiazepine exposure and ICU delirium occurrence. In a cohort of consecutive critically ill adults, daily mental status was classified as either awake without delirium, delirium, or coma. In a first-order Markov model, multinomial logistic regression analysis was used, which considered five possible outcomes the next day (i.e., awake without delirium, delirium, coma, ICU discharge, and death) and 16 delirium-related covariables, to quantify the association between benzodiazepine use and delirium occurrence the following day. Among 1112 patients, 9867 daily transitions occurred. Benzodiazepine administration in an awake patient without delirium was associated with increased risk of delirium the next day [OR 1.04 (per 5 mg of midazolam equivalent administered) 95 % CI 1.02-1.05). When the method of benzodiazepine administration was incorporated in the model, the odds of transitioning to delirium was higher with benzodiazepines given continuously (OR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.03-1.06) compared to benzodiazepines given intermittently (OR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.88-1.05). After addressing potential methodological limitations of prior studies, we confirm that benzodiazepine administration increases the risk for delirium in critically ill adults but this association seems to be limited to continuous infusion use only.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 178 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Other 25 14%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,166,428
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,933
of 5,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,906
of 276,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.