↓ Skip to main content

The win–loss ratio as an ability signal of mutual fund managers: a measure that is less influenced by luck

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The win–loss ratio as an ability signal of mutual fund managers: a measure that is less influenced by luck
Published in
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11408-015-0255-3
Authors

Y. Peter Chung, Thomas Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Financial Markets and Portfolio Management
#36
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,634
of 284,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Markets and Portfolio Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them