Title |
The Effect of Excipients on the Permeability of BCS Class III Compounds and Implications for Biowaivers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11095-015-1773-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan Parr, Ismael J. Hidalgo, Chris Bode, William Brown, Mehran Yazdanian, Mario A. Gonzalez, Kazuko Sagawa, Kevin Miller, Wenlei Jiang, Erika S. Stippler |
Abstract |
Currently, the FDA allows biowaivers for Class I (high solubility and high permeability) and Class III (high solubility and low permeability) compounds of the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). Scientific evidence should be provided to support biowaivers for BCS Class I and Class III (high solubility and low permeability) compounds. Data on the effects of excipients on drug permeability are needed to demonstrate that commonly used excipients do not affect the permeability of BCS Class III compounds, which would support the application of biowaivers to Class III compounds. This study was designed to generate such data by assessing the permeability of four BCS Class III compounds and one Class I compound in the presence and absence of five commonly used excipients. The permeability of each of the compounds was assessed, at three to five concentrations, with each excipient in two different models: Caco-2 cell monolayers, and in situ rat intestinal perfusion. No substantial increases in the permeability of any of the compounds were observed in the presence of any of the tested excipients in either of the models, with the exception of disruption of Caco-2 cell monolayer integrity by sodium lauryl sulfate at 0.1 mg/ml and higher. The results suggest that the absorption of these four BCS Class III compounds would not be greatly affected by the tested excipients. This may have implications in supporting biowaivers for BCS Class III compounds in general. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 17% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 41 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 51 | 40% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
Chemistry | 9 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 42 | 33% |