↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Excipients on the Permeability of BCS Class III Compounds and Implications for Biowaivers

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Excipients on the Permeability of BCS Class III Compounds and Implications for Biowaivers
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11095-015-1773-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Parr, Ismael J. Hidalgo, Chris Bode, William Brown, Mehran Yazdanian, Mario A. Gonzalez, Kazuko Sagawa, Kevin Miller, Wenlei Jiang, Erika S. Stippler

Abstract

Currently, the FDA allows biowaivers for Class I (high solubility and high permeability) and Class III (high solubility and low permeability) compounds of the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). Scientific evidence should be provided to support biowaivers for BCS Class I and Class III (high solubility and low permeability) compounds. Data on the effects of excipients on drug permeability are needed to demonstrate that commonly used excipients do not affect the permeability of BCS Class III compounds, which would support the application of biowaivers to Class III compounds. This study was designed to generate such data by assessing the permeability of four BCS Class III compounds and one Class I compound in the presence and absence of five commonly used excipients. The permeability of each of the compounds was assessed, at three to five concentrations, with each excipient in two different models: Caco-2 cell monolayers, and in situ rat intestinal perfusion. No substantial increases in the permeability of any of the compounds were observed in the presence of any of the tested excipients in either of the models, with the exception of disruption of Caco-2 cell monolayer integrity by sodium lauryl sulfate at 0.1 mg/ml and higher. The results suggest that the absorption of these four BCS Class III compounds would not be greatly affected by the tested excipients. This may have implications in supporting biowaivers for BCS Class III compounds in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 51 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Chemistry 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Materials Science 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 42 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,069,253
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#193
of 2,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,780
of 266,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.