↓ Skip to main content

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease Using Enhanced Probabilistic Neural Network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease Using Enhanced Probabilistic Neural Network
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10916-015-0353-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Hirschauer, Hojjat Adeli, John A. Buford

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains challenging. Neuropathological studies using brain bank specimens have estimated that a large percentages of clinical diagnoses of PD may be incorrect especially in the early stages. In this paper, a comprehensive computer model is presented for the diagnosis of PD based on motor, non-motor, and neuroimaging features using the recently-developed enhanced probabilistic neural network (EPNN). The model is tested for differentiating PD patients from those with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDDs) using the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database, an observational, multi-center study designed to identify PD biomarkers for diagnosis and disease progression. The results are compared to four other commonly-used machine learning algorithms: the probabilistic neural network (PNN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm, and classification tree (CT). The EPNN had the highest classification accuracy at 92.5 % followed by the PNN (91.6 %), k-NN (90.8 %) and CT (90.2 %). The EPNN exhibited an accuracy of 98.6 % when classifying healthy control (HC) versus PD, higher than any previous studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 34 20%
Computer Science 30 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,348,067
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#660
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,605
of 274,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.