↓ Skip to main content

Asthma/COPD Disparities in Diagnosis and Basic Care Utilization Among Low-Income Primary Care Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Asthma/COPD Disparities in Diagnosis and Basic Care Utilization Among Low-Income Primary Care Patients
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10903-018-0798-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Heintzman, Jorge Kaufmann, David Ezekiel-Herrera, Steffani R. Bailey, Alexandra Cornell, Maria Ukhanova, Miguel Marino

Abstract

Obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes in the United States differ between Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. There is little objective data about diagnosis prevalence and primary care visit frequency in these disease processes. We used electronic health record data to perform a retrospective cohort analysis of 34,849 low-income patients seen at Oregon community health centers between 2009 and 2013 to assess joint racial/ethnic and insurance disparities in diagnosis and visit rates between Latino and non-Hispanic white patients. The overall study prevalence of obstructive lung disease was 18%. Latinos had lower odds of obstructive lung disease diagnosis (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.30-0.44). Among those diagnosed prior to 2009, the uninsured (regardless of race/ethnicity) had lower visit rates during 2009-2013 than the insured. This study identified racial/ethnic disparities in the diagnosis of obstructive pulmonary disease between Latinos and non-Hispanic Whites, confirming trends observed in survey research but controlling for important confounders. Health insurance was associated with basic care utilization, suggesting that lack of health insurance could lessen the quality of care for obstructive pulmonary disease in Latino and non-Hispanic white patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,385,846
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#191
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,077
of 334,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.