You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1413579 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Meybohm, Berthold Bein, Oana Brosteanu, Jochen Cremer, Matthias Gruenewald, Christian Stoppe, Mark Coburn, Gereon Schaelte, Andreas Böning, Bernd Niemann, Jan Roesner, Frank Kletzin, Ulrich Strouhal, Christian Reyher, Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann, Marion Ferner, Ivo F Brandes, Martin Bauer, Sebastian N Stehr, Andreas Kortgen, Maria Wittmann, Georg Baumgarten, Tanja Meyer-Treschan, Peter Kienbaum, Matthias Heringlake, Julika Schön, Michael Sander, Sascha Treskatsch, Thorsten Smul, Ewa Wolwender, Thomas Schilling, Georg Fuernau, Dirk Hasenclever, Kai Zacharowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
| Spain | 8 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 23% |
| Scientists | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 418 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 75 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 106 | 25% |
| Unknown | 92 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 230 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 8% |
| Unknown | 107 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#228,702
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,196
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,996
of 293,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#80
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.