You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of heart failure 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Journal of Australia, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5694/mja18.00647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John J Atherton, Andrew Sindone, Carmine G De Pasquale, Andrea Driscoll, Peter S MacDonald, Ingrid Hopper, Peter Kistler, Tom G Briffa, James Wong, Walter P Abhayaratna, Liza Thomas, Ralph Audehm, Phillip J Newton, Joan OˈLoughlin, Cia Connell, Maree Branagan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#713,522
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#396
of 5,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,028
of 343,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#11
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.