↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive effects following acute wild blueberry supplementation in 7- to 10-year-old children

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive effects following acute wild blueberry supplementation in 7- to 10-year-old children
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00394-015-1029-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian R. Whyte, Graham Schafer, Claire M. Williams

Abstract

Previously, anthocyanin-rich blueberry treatments have shown positive effects on cognition in both animals and human adults. However, little research has considered whether these benefits transfer to children. Here we describe an acute time-course and dose-response investigation considering whether these cognitive benefits extend to children. Using a double-blind cross-over design, on three occasions children (n = 21; 7-10 years) consumed placebo (vehicle) or blueberry drinks containing 15 or 30 g freeze-dried wild blueberry (WBB) powder. A cognitive battery including tests of verbal memory, word recognition, response interference, response inhibition and levels of processing was performed at baseline, and 1.15, 3 and 6 h following treatment. Significant WBB-related improvements included final immediate recall at 1.15 h, delayed word recognition sustained over each period, and accuracy on cognitively demanding incongruent trials in the interference task at 3 h. Importantly, across all measures, cognitive performance improved, consistent with a dose-response model, with the best performance following 30 g WBB and the worst following vehicle. Findings demonstrate WBB-related cognitive improvements in 7- to 10-year-old children. These effects would seem to be particularly sensitive to the cognitive demand of task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Psychology 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 47 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#193,799
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#66
of 2,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,469
of 283,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.