↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging shows widespread blood-brain barrier disruption in mild traumatic brain injury patients with post-concussion syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging shows widespread blood-brain barrier disruption in mild traumatic brain injury patients with post-concussion syndrome
Published in
European Radiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5656-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roh-Eul Yoo, Seung Hong Choi, Byung-Mo Oh, Sang Do Shin, Eun Jung Lee, Dong Jae Shin, Sang Won Jo, Koung Mi Kang, Tae Jin Yun, Ji-hoon Kim, Chul-Ho Sohn

Abstract

To explore the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging for quantitative analysis of blood-brain barrier disruption in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients with post-concussion syndrome (PCS). Forty-four consecutive patients with PCS after mTBI and 32 controls were included in this retrospective study. Ktrans and ve from DCE MR imaging were analyzed at contrast-enhancing lesions, T2 hyperintense white matter (WM) lesions, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and predilection sites for diffuse axonal injury (LocationDAI). The Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to compare the parameters between mTBI patients and controls and the parameters were correlated with neuropsychological tests using Mann-Whitney U-test and Spearman rank correlation. The median ve of the T2 hyperintense WM lesions in mTBI patients (n=21) was higher than that of NAWM in controls (p=.027). Both median Ktrans and ve at NAWM were also significantly higher in mTBI patients than in controls (p=.023 and p=.029, respectively). In addition, mTBI patients had higher Ktrans and ve at LocationDAI than controls (p=.008 and p=.015, respectively). VLT (delayed recall) scores were significantly correlated with ve values at T2 hyperintense WM lesions (p=-0.767, p=.044). The median ve at LocationDAI was significantly higher in patients with atypical performance in the digit span test (forward) than in those with average or good performance (p=.043). mTBI patients with PCS had higher Ktrans and ve values than controls not only at T2 hyperintense WM lesions but also at NAWM and LocationDAI. BBB disruption may be implicated in development of PCS in mTBI patients. • mTBI patients with PCS had higher permeability than controls at T2 hyperintense WM lesions on DCE MR imaging. • mTBI patients with PCS had higher permeability than controls also at NAWM and predilection sites for DAI. • BBB disruption may be implicated in the development of PCS in mTBI patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,137,809
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,129
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,901
of 329,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#33
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.