↓ Skip to main content

Selective inhibition of P-gp transporter by goniothalamin derivatives sensitizes resistant cancer cells to chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Natural Medicines, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Selective inhibition of P-gp transporter by goniothalamin derivatives sensitizes resistant cancer cells to chemotherapy
Published in
Journal of Natural Medicines, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11418-018-1230-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Sachs, Onat Kadioglu, Anja Weber, Vanessa Mundorf, Janina Betz, Thomas Efferth, Jörg Pietruszka, Nicole Teusch

Abstract

Overexpression of efflux transporters of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family, primarily P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is a frequent cause of multidrug resistance in cancer and leads to failure of current chemotherapies. Thus, identification of selective P-gp inhibitors might provide a basis for the development of novel anticancer drug candidates. The natural product goniothalamin and 21 derivatives were characterized regarding their ability to inhibit ABC transporter function. Among the goniothalamins, selective inhibitors of P-gp were discovered. The two most potent inhibitors (R)-3 and (S)-3 displayed the ability to increase intracellular accumulation of doxorubicin, thereby sensitizing P-gp-overexpressing tumor cells to chemotherapy by decreasing doxorubicin IC50 value up to 15-fold. Molecular docking studies indicated these compounds to inhibit P-gp by acting as transporter substrates. In conclusion, our findings revealed a novel role of goniothalamin derivatives in reversing P-gp-mediated chemotherapy resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,623,794
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#189
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,146
of 329,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them