↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the role of participants in evolution of topic lifecycles on social networks

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Social Networks, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the role of participants in evolution of topic lifecycles on social networks
Published in
Computational Social Networks, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40649-018-0054-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuntal Dey, Saroj Kaushik, Kritika Garg, Ritvik Shrivastava

Abstract

Topic lifecycle analysis on social networks aims to analyze and track how topics are born from user-generated content, and how they evolve. Twitter researchers have no agreed-upon definition of topics; topics on Twitter are typically derived in the form of (a) frequently used hashtags, or (b) keywords showing sudden trends of large occurrence in a short span of time ("bursty keywords"), or (c) concepts latent within the tweets that are grouped using variations of semantic clustering techniques. In the current paper, we jointly model the hashtags present and the semantic concepts embedded in the content, which in turn helps us identify hashtag groups that define a "topic"-a concept space-that are used by a large number of tweets. We observe that different hashtags belonging to a given cluster are more prominent compared to the others, at different times. We further observe that the participation and influence levels of the different users play important roles in determining which hashtag would be more prominent than the others at given times. We thus observe topics to often morph from one to the other (via morphing of dominant hashtags representing the same semantic concept space), rather than becoming extinct outright, which is a novel insight about topic lifecycles. We further present novel observations about the role of users in determining the lifecycle of discussion topics on Twitter. We infer that topic lifecycles are governed by user interests, and not by user influence, which is a key observation made by our work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 9%
Mathematics 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,726,986
of 25,390,692 outputs
Outputs from Computational Social Networks
#24
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,673
of 337,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Social Networks
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them