↓ Skip to main content

National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, Lung & Circulation, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,537)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation 2018
Published in
Heart, Lung & Circulation, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.1043
Pubmed ID
Authors

NHFA CSANZ Atrial Fibrillation Guideline Working Group, David Brieger, John Amerena, John Attia, Beata Bajorek, Kim H. Chan, Cia Connell, Ben Freedman, Caleb Ferguson, Tanya Hall, Haris Haqqani, Jeroen Hendriks, Charlotte Hespe, Joseph Hung, Jonathan M. Kalman, Prashanthan Sanders, John Worthington, Tristan D. Yan, Nicholas Zwar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 194 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Other 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 69 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Engineering 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 78 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,290,693
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Heart, Lung & Circulation
#37
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,511
of 354,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart, Lung & Circulation
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.