↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy
Published in
Quality of Life Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11136-018-1955-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Utsana Tonmukayakul, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Lidia Engel, Jessica Bucholc, Brendan Mulhern, Rob Carter, Cathrine Mihalopoulos

Abstract

Project aims include the following: (i) to identify reported utility values associated with CP in children aged ≤ 18 years; (ii) to explore utility value elicitation techniques in published studies; and (iii) to examine performance of the measures and/or elicitation approaches. Peer-reviewed studies published prior to March 2017 were identified from six electronic databases. Construct validity, convergent validity, responsiveness, and reliability of instruments were assessed. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Utility values of hypothetical general CP states obtained from a general population of parents ranged from 0.55 to 0.88 using time trade off (TTO) and 0.60-0.87 using standard gamble (SG) techniques. Utility values reported by clinicians of three hypothetical spastic quadriplegic CP states, using the Health Utility Index Mark 2 (HUI-2), ranged from 0.40 to 0.13. Other sources of utilities identified were based on both proxy and child ratings using Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) (values ranged from - 0.013 to 0.84 depending on the valuation source) and the Assessment of Quality of Life 4 Dimension instrument, with values ranging from 0.01 to 0.58. Construct validity of the HUI-3 varied from moderate to strong, whereas mixed results were found for convergent validity. Responsiveness and reliability were not reported. There was substantial variation in reported utilities. Indirect techniques (i.e. via multi-attribute utility instruments) were more frequently used than direct techniques (e.g. TTO, SG). Further research is required to improve the robustness of utility valuation of health-related quality of life in children with CP for use in economic evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 21 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,376,173
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#298
of 2,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,251
of 332,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#10
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,944 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.