↓ Skip to main content

Consensus Paper: Cerebellar Development

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
341 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
Title
Consensus Paper: Cerebellar Development
Published in
The Cerebellum, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12311-015-0724-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ketty Leto, Marife Arancillo, Esther B. E. Becker, Annalisa Buffo, Chin Chiang, Baojin Ding, William B. Dobyns, Isabelle Dusart, Parthiv Haldipur, Mary E. Hatten, Mikio Hoshino, Alexandra L. Joyner, Masanobu Kano, Daniel L. Kilpatrick, Noriyuki Koibuchi, Silvia Marino, Salvador Martinez, Kathleen J. Millen, Thomas O. Millner, Takaki Miyata, Elena Parmigiani, Karl Schilling, Gabriella Sekerková, Roy V. Sillitoe, Constantino Sotelo, Naofumi Uesaka, Annika Wefers, Richard J. T. Wingate, Richard Hawkes

Abstract

The development of the mammalian cerebellum is orchestrated by both cell-autonomous programs and inductive environmental influences. Here, we describe the main processes of cerebellar ontogenesis, highlighting the neurogenic strategies used by developing progenitors, the genetic programs involved in cell fate specification, the progressive changes of structural organization, and some of the better-known abnormalities associated with developmental disorders of the cerebellum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 421 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 21%
Student > Master 62 15%
Researcher 50 12%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 99 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 100 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 7%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 116 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,408,242
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#141
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,512
of 281,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.