| Title |
Global Non-Potential Magnetic Models of the Solar Corona During the March 2015 Eclipse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-018-0534-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony R. Yeates, Tahar Amari, Ioannis Contopoulos, Xueshang Feng, Duncan H. Mackay, Zoran Mikić, Thomas Wiegelmann, Joseph Hutton, Christopher A. Lowder, Huw Morgan, Gordon Petrie, Laurel A. Rachmeler, Lisa A. Upton, Aurelien Canou, Pierre Chopin, Cooper Downs, Miloslav Druckmüller, Jon A. Linker, Daniel B. Seaton, Tibor Török |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 62% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,218,176
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#203
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,505
of 344,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.