You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lynch Syndrome–Associated Breast Cancers: Clinicopathologic Characteristics of a Case Series from the Colon Cancer Family Registry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3058 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael D. Walsh, Daniel D. Buchanan, Margaret C. Cummings, Sally-Ann Pearson, Sven T. Arnold, Mark Clendenning, Rhiannon Walters, Diane M. McKeone, Amanda B. Spurdle, John L. Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins, Kerry D. Phillips, Graeme K. Suthers, Jill George, Jack Goldblatt, Amanda Muir, Kathy Tucker, Elise Pelzer, Michael R. Gattas, Sonja Woodall, Susan Parry, Finlay A. Macrae, Robert W. Haile, John A. Baron, John D. Potter, Loic Le Marchand, Bharati Bapat, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Noralane M. Lindor, Michael A. McGuckin, Joanne P. Young |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,146,108
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,709
of 13,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,699
of 108,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#11
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.