You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
〈コミュニケーション障害への社会的支援:当事者,支援者とのネットワークづくり〉欠格条項撤廃に取り組んで:聴覚障害者の立場から
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.11219/jjcomdis2003.21.129 |
| Authors |
臼井 久実子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,749,194
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
#3
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,816
of 61,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them