↓ Skip to main content

Interaction of quality of life, mood and depression of patients and their informal caregivers after surgical treatment of high-grade glioma: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Interaction of quality of life, mood and depression of patients and their informal caregivers after surgical treatment of high-grade glioma: a prospective study
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2962-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxi Sacher, Jürgen Meixensberger, Wolfgang Krupp

Abstract

Patients who are diagnosed with high-grade gliomas (HGG) have poor prognoses and often experience rapid declines in functional and cognitive status, which makes caring for them particularly stressful. We conducted a prospective study to investigate the factors influencing the quality of life of HGG patients and their informal caregivers and analyzed their reciprocal impacts. Based on our results, we elaborated a screening model to identify patients and caregivers in need of psychooncological support. A total of 45 matched HGG patient-caregiver dyads completed the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire, the 12-Item Short Form Medical Outcome Questionnaire and the Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression Scale. A subsequent semi-structured interview was performed with each individual. We found a significant relationship between the mood and depression scores of patients and caregivers, with a third of them displaying symptoms of a major depressive episode. Our screening model showed that 73% of the dyads exhibited signs of severe emotional strain with the need of psychooncological support. Beneficial factors that helped patients and caregivers cope with the illness included mutual respect, good communication, caregiver mastery and resilience. For a more comprehensive understanding of patient-caregiver interactions, we recommend using a combination of standardized psychometric tests and a semi-structured interview. The high percentage of emotional strain and depression found in patients and their caregivers facing HGG highlights the necessity of methodical screening for warning signs and consequent initiation of psycho-oncological interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Psychology 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,594
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,972
of 331,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#50
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.