↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Can Dietary and Physical Activity Modifications Reduce Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women? The DAMA Study, a Randomized Intervention Trial in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Can Dietary and Physical Activity Modifications Reduce Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women? The DAMA Study, a Randomized Intervention Trial in Italy
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2019
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanna Masala, Melania Assedi, Francesco Sera, Ilaria Ermini, Daniela Occhini, Maria Castaldo, Elena Pierpaoli, Saverio Caini, Benedetta Bendinelli, Daniela Ambrogetti, Domenico Palli

Abstract

Few randomized trials have been carried out to evaluate the effect of lifestyle modifications on mammographic breast density (MBD). The randomized 2x2 factorial DAMA trial aimed to evaluate whether MBD can be reduced in post-menopausal women with high baseline MBD by a 24-months dietary and/or physical activity (PA) interventions. We randomized healthy post-menopausal women, attending the Florence (Italy) mammographic screening program, aged 50-69 years, non-smokers, with MBD>50% and no recent hormone therapy, to: a) a dietary intervention focused on plant-foods, with a low glycemic load, low in saturated fats and alcohol; b) a PA intervention combining daily moderate intensity activities and one weekly supervised session of more strenuous activity; c) both interventions; d) general recommendations. We evaluated changes in MBD based on VolparaTM estimates comparing baseline and follow-up digital mammograms by an intention-to-treat-analysis. MBD measures were available for 226 participants. An interaction emerged between treatments and thus we run analyses by arms. A decrease in volumetric percent density emerged for women in the dietary intervention (ratio 0.91; 95%CI 0.86-0.97; p=0.002) and in the PA intervention arm (0.93; 95%CI 0.87-0.98; p=0.01) in comparison with controls. No clear effect emerged in the double intervention arm. This intervention trial suggests that a 24-months dietary or PA intervention may reduce MBD in postmenopausal women. A modification of dietary habits or an increase in PA in postmenopausal women may reduce MBD. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings for planning breast cancer preventive strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 68 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 69 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,608,549
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#505
of 4,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,139
of 444,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#10
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.