| Title |
Constraints to and conservation implications for climate change adaptation in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-015-0782-5 |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Christmas, Martin F. Breed, Andrew J. Lowe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 49% |
| Scientists | 17 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 265 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 22% |
| Researcher | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2022.
All research outputs
#884,060
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#41
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,982
of 279,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.