| Title |
On the need for phylogenetic ‘corrections’ in functional trait-based approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12224-015-9228-6 |
| Authors |
Francesco de Bello, Matty P. Berg, André T. C. Dias, Jose Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho, Lars Götzenberger, Joaquín Hortal, Richard J. Ladle, Jan Lepš |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Estonia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 301 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 25% |
| Researcher | 59 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 154 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 80 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,675,283
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#11
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,602
of 293,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.