↓ Skip to main content

Taking laboratory uncertainties into account in the Hampel estimator

Overview of attention for article published in Accreditation and Quality Assurance, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Taking laboratory uncertainties into account in the Hampel estimator
Published in
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00769-018-1332-x
Authors

Steffen Uhlig, Bertrand Colson, Petra Gowik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Materials Science 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,623,794
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#82
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,376
of 329,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.