| Title |
Removal of heavy metals from emerging cellulosic low-cost adsorbents: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Water Science, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13201-016-0401-8 |
| Authors |
D. S. Malik, C. K. Jain, Anuj K. Yadav |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 508 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 12% |
| Researcher | 39 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 83 | 16% |
| Unknown | 162 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 96 | 19% |
| Engineering | 59 | 12% |
| Chemical Engineering | 55 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 8% |
| Unknown | 196 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,243,258
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Applied Water Science
#15
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,383
of 301,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Water Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them