↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota issue in CKD: how promising are gut-targeted approaches?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Microbiota issue in CKD: how promising are gut-targeted approaches?
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40620-018-0516-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmela Cosola, Maria Teresa Rocchetti, Alice Sabatino, Enrico Fiaccadori, Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio, Loreto Gesualdo

Abstract

In chronic kidney disease (CKD), the progressive decline in the renal excretory function leads to accumulation of urea and toxins in the blood. The CKD-associated dysbiosis of gut microbiota further contributes to uremia by increasing intestinal toxins production. Gut microbiota is involved in a complex network of human organs, mediated by microbial metabolites: in CKD, gut-heart and gut-brain axes may have a role in increased cardiovascular risk and neuropsychiatric disorders. While the cardiovascular toxicity of some microbial molecules is well known, their presumptive neurotoxicity needs to be confirmed by specific studies. In this review, we describe gut-heart and gut-brain axes in CKD, with an overview of the experimental and human studies characterizing CKD-associated gut microbiota, and we discuss the benefits coming from new approaches aimed at gut manipulation. Microbiota metabolism is emerging as a modifiable non-traditional risk factor in nephrology. In order to take advantage of this issue, it is necessary to consider the microbiota manipulation as part of the nutritional management of CKD. Integrating the low-protein nutritional approach with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic supplementation is a promising tool to control disease progression and comorbidities, though an extensive validation in large-scale clinical trials is still required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 41 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,022,688
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#100
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,331
of 334,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.