↓ Skip to main content

Adenosinergic signaling as a target for natural killer cell immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Adenosinergic signaling as a target for natural killer cell immunotherapy
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00109-018-1679-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiao Wang, Sandro Matosevic

Abstract

Purinergic signaling through adenosine plays a key role in immune regulation. Hypoxia-driven accumulation of extracellular adenosine results in the generation of an immunosuppressive niche that fuels tumor development. Such immunometabolic modulation has shown to be a promising therapeutic target through blockade of adenosine receptors which mediate adenosine's immunosuppressive function, or cancer-associated ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 that catalyze the synthesis of adenosine. Adenosinergic signaling heavily implicates natural killer cells through both direct and indirect effects on their cytolytic activity, expression of cytotoxic granules, interferon-γ, and activating receptors. Continuing work has uncovered multiple checkpoints linked to adenosine within the purinergic signaling cascade as contributing to immune evasion from NK cell effector function. Here, we discuss these checkpoints and the recent body of work that focuses on adenosinergic signaling as a target for natural killer cell of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,391,095
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#412
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,594
of 331,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.