↓ Skip to main content

Genetic algorithm based cancerous gene identification from microarray data using ensemble of filter methods

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Genetic algorithm based cancerous gene identification from microarray data using ensemble of filter methods
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11517-018-1874-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manosij Ghosh, Sukdev Adhikary, Kushal Kanti Ghosh, Aritra Sardar, Shemim Begum, Ram Sarkar

Abstract

Microarray datasets play a crucial role in cancer detection. But the high dimension of these datasets makes the classification challenging due to the presence of many irrelevant and redundant features. Hence, feature selection becomes irreplaceable in this field because of its ability to remove the unrequired features from the system. As the task of selecting the optimal number of features is an NP-hard problem, hence, some meta-heuristic search technique helps to cope up with this problem. In this paper, we propose a 2-stage model for feature selection in microarray datasets. The ranking of the genes for the different filter methods are quite diverse and effectiveness of rankings is datasets dependent. First, we develop an ensemble of filter methods by considering the union and intersection of the top-n features of ReliefF, chi-square, and symmetrical uncertainty. This ensemble allows us to combine all the information of the three rankings together in a subset. In the next stage, we use genetic algorithm (GA) on the union and intersection to get the fine-tuned results, and union performs better than the latter. Our model has been shown to be classifier independent through the use of three classifiers-multi-layer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbor (K-NN). We have tested our model on five cancer datasets-colon, lung, leukemia, SRBCT, and prostate. Experimental results illustrate the superiority of our model in comparison to state-of-the-art methods. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Lecturer 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 33%
Engineering 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Chemistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 31 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#1,899
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,007
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.