↓ Skip to main content

ADMI color and toxicity reductions in raw textile mill effluent and dye mixtures by TiO2/UV is limited by presence of vat dyes

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
ADMI color and toxicity reductions in raw textile mill effluent and dye mixtures by TiO2/UV is limited by presence of vat dyes
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-2814-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann H. Mounteer, Gemima Santos Arcanjo, Eder Carlos Lopes Coimbra, Laís Miguelina Marçal da Silva

Abstract

Full-scale application of heterogeneous photocatalysis for industrial wastewater treatment remains a challenge because of the complex nature of these matrices and the potential to form toxic by-products during treatment. A recent unsuccessful attempt to find adequate conditions for TiO2/UV treatment of a cotton dyeing textile mill led to this study on the treatability of mixtures of the dyes used in the greatest amounts at the mill and therefore most likely to be present in mill effluent. Four reactive and three vat dyes were mixed in different combinations and treated (10 mg/L of each dye, 0.5 mg/L TiO2, pH 4) to evaluate the influence of the different dyes on ADMI color, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and acute toxicity. While ADMI color removal was similar in all dye mixtures, COD removal was higher when vat dyes were absent. When treated individually, vat dyes exhibited greater recalcitrance, with no ADMI color removal and COD removals of less than 30%. Toxicity to Daphnia similis was decreased or eliminated from dye mixtures that exhibited the highest COD removals and corresponded to those in which reactive dyes were partially degraded. For raw textile mill effluent, photocatalysis reduced but did not eliminate treated effluent toxicity (EC50 = 26.8%).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 10 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#5,443
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,197
of 334,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#89
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.