| Title |
Evaluation of Magnesium Die-Casting Alloys for Elevated Temperature Applications: Microstructure, Tensile Properties, and Creep Resistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11661-015-2946-9 |
| Authors |
Suming Zhu, Mark A. Easton, Trevor B. Abbott, Jian-Feng Nie, Matthew S. Dargusch, Norbert Hort, Mark A. Gibson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 28 | 43% |
| Engineering | 14 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,686,573
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#155
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,791
of 267,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.