↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for functional dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for functional dyspepsia
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00535-014-1022-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroto Miwa, Motoyasu Kusano, Tomiyasu Arisawa, Tadayuki Oshima, Mototsugu Kato, Takashi Joh, Hidekazu Suzuki, Kazunari Tominaga, Koji Nakada, Akihito Nagahara, Seiji Futagami, Noriaki Manabe, Akio Inui, Ken Haruma, Kazuhide Higuchi, Koji Yakabi, Michio Hongo, Naomi Uemura, Yoshikazu Kinoshita, Kentaro Sugano, Tooru Shimosegawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 59 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 63 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,755,002
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#682
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,987
of 353,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.