You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microcirculatory dysfunction and resuscitation: why, when, and how
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bja/aev163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J P R Moore, A Dyson, M Singer, J Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#5,575
of 6,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,155
of 279,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.