↓ Skip to main content

A Dissemination and Implementation Science Approach to the Epidemic of Opioid Use Disorder in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A Dissemination and Implementation Science Approach to the Epidemic of Opioid Use Disorder in the United States
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11904-018-0409-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie M. Mathis, Nicholas Hagemeier, Angela Hagaman, John Dreyzehner, Robert P. Pack

Abstract

This review aims to (1) conceptualize the complexity of the opioid use disorder epidemic using a conceptual model grounded in the disease continuum and corresponding levels of prevention and (2) summarize a select set of interventions for the prevention and treatment of opioid use disorder. Epidemiologic data indicate non-medical prescription and illicit opioid use have reached unprecedented levels, fueling an opioid use disorder epidemic in the USA. A problem of this magnitude is rooted in multiple supply- and demand-side drivers, the combined effect of which outweighs current prevention and treatment efforts. Multiple primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention interventions, both evidence-informed and evidence-based, are available to address each point along the disease continuum-non-use, initiation, dependence, addiction, and death. If interventions grounded in the best available evidence are disseminated and implemented across the disease continuum in a coordinated and collaborative manner, public health systems could be increasingly effective in responding to the epidemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Social Sciences 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Engineering 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 22 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,584,501
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#164
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,856
of 332,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.