↓ Skip to main content

Re-examining selective adaptation: Fatiguing feature detectors, or distributional learning?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Re-examining selective adaptation: Fatiguing feature detectors, or distributional learning?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0943-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dave F. Kleinschmidt, T. Florian Jaeger

Abstract

When a listener hears many good examples of a /b/ in a row, they are less likely to classify other sounds on, e.g., a /b/-to-/d/ continuum as /b/. This phenomenon is known as selective adaptation and is a well-studied property of speech perception. Traditionally, selective adaptation is seen as a mechanistic property of the speech perception system, and attributed to fatigue in acoustic-phonetic feature detectors. However, recent developments in our understanding of non-linguistic sensory adaptation and higher-level adaptive plasticity in speech perception and language comprehension suggest that it is time to re-visit the phenomenon of selective adaptation. We argue that selective adaptation is better thought of as a computational property of the speech perception system. Drawing on a common thread in recent work on both non-linguistic sensory adaptation and plasticity in language comprehension, we furthermore propose that selective adaptation can be seen as a consequence of distributional learning across multiple levels of representation. This proposal opens up new questions for research on selective adaptation itself, and also suggests that selective adaptation can be an important bridge between work on adaptation in low-level sensory systems and the complicated plasticity of the adult language comprehension system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 35%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 39%
Linguistics 21 23%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Computer Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 13 14%