↓ Skip to main content

Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Association with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 114)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Association with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Published in
The Journal of Urology, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan S. Hsi, Andrew J. Spieker, Marshall L. Stoller, David R. Jacobs, Alex P. Reiner, Robyn L. McClelland, Arnold J. Kahn, Thomas Chi, Moyses Szklo, Mathew D. Sorensen

Abstract

Subclinical coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an established predictor of cardiovascular events. While a history of kidney stones has been linked to subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, no study has examined its relationship with CAC. We studied the association between kidney stone history and prevalent CAC from the MESA study. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis is a multi-site cohort study of participants aged 45-84 without known cardiovascular disease at baseline (2000-2002). At follow up in 2010-2012, 3,282 participants underwent computed tomography to determine CAC and had kidney stone history assessed by self-report. CAC scores were categorized as none, mild (<100), moderate (101-400), or severe (>400). A cross-sectional analysis was performed adjusting for demographic and dietary factors related to kidney stones. Prevalence of kidney stone disease history was approximately 9%, mean age was 69.5±9.3 years, 39% of participants were Caucasian, 47% were men, and 69% had detectable (CAC score >0). No difference in CAC score was seen between single stone formers and non-stone formers. Recurrent kidney stone formation was associated with moderate or severe CAC on multivariable logistic regression (versus none or mild CAC) (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.22-2.67). When CAC scores were separated into none, mild, moderate, and severe CAC, recurrent stone formation was associated with higher CAC score category on multivariable ordinal logistic regression (OR per category 1.44, 95% CI 1.04- 2.01). Recurrent kidney stone formation is associated with subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. This association appeared stronger with CAC severity than with CAC presence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,845,051
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#16
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,979
of 290,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them