Title |
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Cognitive Impairment, Glycometabolism, and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Deficits in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Imaging and Biology, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11307-018-1253-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuki Matsuura, Masashi Ueda, Yusuke Higaki, Kohei Sano, Hideo Saji, Shuichi Enomoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#93
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,220
of 341,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.