↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic characterisation of Proteusterrae sp. nov., a N2O-producing, nitrate-ammonifying soil bacterium

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Taxonomic characterisation of Proteusterrae sp. nov., a N2O-producing, nitrate-ammonifying soil bacterium
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10482-015-0601-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Undine Behrendt, Jürgen Augustin, Cathrin Spröer, Jörg Gelbrecht, Peter Schumann, Andreas Ulrich

Abstract

In the context of studying the influence of N-fertilization on N2 and N2O flux rates in relation to the soil bacterial community composition in fen peat grassland, a group of bacterial strains was isolated that performed dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium and concomitantly produced N2O. The amount of nitrous oxide produced was influenced by the C/N ratio of the medium. The potential to generate nitrous oxide was increased by higher availability of nitrate-N. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA and the rpoB gene sequences demonstrated that the investigated isolates belong to the genus Proteus, showing high similarity with the respective type strains of Proteus vulgaris and Proteus penneri. DNA-DNA hybridization studies revealed differences at the species level. These differences were substantiated by MALDI-TOF MS analysis and several distinct physiological characteristics. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that the soil isolates represent a novel species for which the name Proteus terrae sp. nov. (type strain N5/687(T) =DSM 29910(T) =LMG 28659(T)) is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 25%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,223,325
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#470
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,370
of 277,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.