| Title |
Microcystic meningioma: difficulties in diagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neurologica Belgica, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13760-017-0760-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mehmet Cagri Danisman, Kazim Serhan Kelesoglu, Mesut Sivri, Mustafa Koplay, Yahya Paksoy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,729,442
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#308
of 852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,539
of 435,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.