↓ Skip to main content

Parasites modulate within-colony activity and accelerate the temporal polyethism schedule of a social insect, the honey bee

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Parasites modulate within-colony activity and accelerate the temporal polyethism schedule of a social insect, the honey bee
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00265-015-2019-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myrsini E. Natsopoulou, Dino P. McMahon, Robert J. Paxton

Abstract

Task allocation in social insect colonies is generally organised into an age-related division of labour, termed the temporal polyethism schedule, which may in part have evolved to reduce infection of the colony's brood by pests and pathogens. The temporal polyethism schedule is sensitive to colony perturbations that may lead to adaptive changes in task allocation, maintaining colony homeostasis. Though social insects can be infected by a range of parasites, little is known of how these parasites impact within-colony behaviour and the temporal polyethism schedule. We use honey bees (Apis mellifera) experimentally infected by two of their emerging pathogens, Deformed wing virus (DWV), which is relatively understudied concerning its behavioural impact on its host, and the exotic microsporidian Nosema ceranae. We examined parasite effects on host temporal polyethism and patterns of activity within the colony. We found that pathogens accelerated the temporal polyethism schedule, but without reducing host behavioural repertoire. Infected hosts exhibited increased hyperactivity, allocating more time to self-grooming and foraging-related tasks. The strength of behavioural alterations we observed was found to be pathogen specific; behavioural modifications were more pronounced in virus-treated hosts versus N. ceranae-treated hosts, with potential benefits for the colony in terms of reducing within-colony transmission. Investigating the effects of multiple pathogens on behavioural patterns of social insects could play a crucial role in understanding pathogen spread within a colony and their effects on colony social organisation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 47%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 41 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,550,468
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2,634
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,075
of 279,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.