↓ Skip to main content

National Database for Autism Research (NDAR): Big Data Opportunities for Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
National Database for Autism Research (NDAR): Big Data Opportunities for Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40273-015-0331-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nalin Payakachat, J. Mick Tilford, Wendy J. Ungar

Abstract

The National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) is a US National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded research data repository created by integrating heterogeneous datasets through data sharing agreements between autism researchers and the NIH. To date, NDAR is considered the largest neuroscience and genomic data repository for autism research. In addition to biomedical data, NDAR contains a large collection of clinical and behavioral assessments and health outcomes from novel interventions. Importantly, NDAR has a global unique patient identifier that can be linked to aggregated individual-level data for hypothesis generation and testing, and for replicating research findings. As such, NDAR promotes collaboration and maximizes public investment in the original data collection. As screening and diagnostic technologies as well as interventions for children with autism are expensive, health services research (HSR) and health technology assessment (HTA) are needed to generate more evidence to facilitate implementation when warranted. This article describes NDAR and explains its value to health services researchers and decision scientists interested in autism and other mental health conditions. We provide a description of the scope and structure of NDAR and illustrate how data are likely to grow over time and become available for HSR and HTA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 12%
Computer Science 18 11%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 47 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,643,807
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,302
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,367
of 278,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.